Shoutbox

« archive

avatar
officially saying goodbye
avatar
Thanks brother
avatar
avatar
Reluctantly I will, What is it again?
avatar
OUDAN, you gonna sign up for the new site?
avatar
Last one out, turn off the lights
avatar
GIG pick 1.25 SD traded to Denver for 1.29 and 4.09
avatar
cheers
avatar
You have been activated Scally
avatar
looks nice
avatar
sweet. im in pending approval
avatar
correct. ideally all leagues will be moving over
avatar
Pretty sure GIG and baseball leagues will be following suit shortly.
avatar
So all active leagues here will be at new site?
avatar
https://dynastysportshub.proboards.com We're moving leagues to a new site folks. Several users report not being able to access this site anymore. New board will have 3 admins instead of one absent admin so we should be able to keep things better updated.
avatar
1.3 pick in gig is on the block if anyone is interested
avatar
gotcha... makes sense. I just have draft brain right now and I'm a degenerate lol.
avatar
the thought was to wait until after the bulk of memorial day weekend so as to not stall out for a couple days, but I suppose there is no harm in it.
avatar
gig untimed start now?
avatar
Way to go QFL. Another great draft in the books
Poll: Do you agree to add $2 to the league buy-in to create a contingency fund to help recruit GMs for orphaned teams?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes, change the buy-in to create a contingency fund
77.78%
14 77.78%
No, keep the existing buy-in
22.22%
4 22.22%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Changing the league buy-in to create a contingency fund
#1
The TL;DR – There is no greater detail to this, simply a proposal that the league alters its buy-in for 2025 onwards from $60 to $62.

The intention is that the payout structure will remain the same, based on the $60 entry fee, and that these extra funds in the pot will allow for us to have a small ‘contingency fund’ to apply discounts to buy-ins in the case where an orphaned team is left in such a poor state, or in the case where Fantrax raises its prices for the premium options on which our league relies.

Commissioners can and will still apply premiums when recruiting GMs for orphaned teams that are in a strong position, and these premiums will help supplement the contingency fund.

Questions/discussion can follow below.
#2
In the event where the above described scenarios happen to not come in play, what is to happen with these funds? I only ask for transparency because I ran into an issue with this last season, which I was asked to pay a premium to enter the league which I was ok with and asked to forfeit a portion of my 2nd place winnings last season. To this day I don't know where that money I put into the league went?
Red Sox - NP (Administrator)
Dodgers - BTL
#3
That'd be up to the league to decide, but for argument's sake if we had a really good few years and got up above $300 then we could rebate $10 to each member of the league, for instance, or knock it off an entry fee.
#4
I believe in the past it has gone to the Fantrax Premium fee, effectively bumping up the prize pool
#5
(01-31-2024, 16:27)thepetis Wrote: I believe in the past it has gone to the Fantrax Premium fee, effectively bumping up the prize pool
That makes total sense.  My issue is just the transparency.  I had to buy the Dodgers for $90 (previous owner already had his entry fee paid) and I was asked to forfeit like around $60 of my winnings last year.  I didn't see our prize pool increase.  Our fees did not go down this season.  Where did the $150 go?
Red Sox - NP (Administrator)
Dodgers - BTL
#6
∆this
#7
Good for $62
#8
good for $62 (where is my discoubt hehe)
#9
If someone is trading draft picks or cap beyond the current year, I would say that they should pay up for those seasons before they do so. That would go pretty far to creating a contingency fund and not have everyone shoulder the burden of that.
#10
The vote is passed - the new charge will be instituted from next season.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)