Shoutbox

« archive

avatar
officially saying goodbye
avatar
Thanks brother
avatar
avatar
Reluctantly I will, What is it again?
avatar
OUDAN, you gonna sign up for the new site?
avatar
Last one out, turn off the lights
avatar
GIG pick 1.25 SD traded to Denver for 1.29 and 4.09
avatar
cheers
avatar
You have been activated Scally
avatar
looks nice
avatar
sweet. im in pending approval
avatar
correct. ideally all leagues will be moving over
avatar
Pretty sure GIG and baseball leagues will be following suit shortly.
avatar
So all active leagues here will be at new site?
avatar
https://dynastysportshub.proboards.com We're moving leagues to a new site folks. Several users report not being able to access this site anymore. New board will have 3 admins instead of one absent admin so we should be able to keep things better updated.
avatar
1.3 pick in gig is on the block if anyone is interested
avatar
gotcha... makes sense. I just have draft brain right now and I'm a degenerate lol.
avatar
the thought was to wait until after the bulk of memorial day weekend so as to not stall out for a couple days, but I suppose there is no harm in it.
avatar
gig untimed start now?
avatar
Way to go QFL. Another great draft in the books
Rule Proposal for input/vote
#1
PK and I are proposing allowing new owners taking over teams to have one penalty-free drop upon taking over the team, allowing a team to get out of a bad contract, and making orphaned teams a bit more appealing to new owners. Please vote below or add thoughts and input below.
Reply
#2
In favor, would also suggest unlimited free drops. The orphan situation is always bad long term.

-ARZ
Reply
#3
We discussed it but figured one would be more fair to existing owners who won't get the chance.
Reply
#4
I’m good with it
Reply
#5
Yeah. One is fine, but we are all only a year in and had to manage tight cap in the draft and free agency. Wouldn't be fair to let new teams get that cap space cleared with more than one.
Reply
#6
Cool with me
Reply
#7
I vote yes. Makes orphaned teams more desirable
Reply
#8
I like it!
Reply
#9
Yeah I voted for one instead of unlimited due to the fact we were only one year in
Reply
#10
If you think it will make a difference, then sure. I suspect it's a lack of candidates for new owners rather than the salary.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)