Rule Proposal for input/vote - Printable Version +- Dynasty Sports Hub (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com) +-- Forum: Football (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=28) +--- Forum: Football Leagues (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +---- Forum: Grid Iron Glory (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +----- Forum: Grid Iron Glory History (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17) +----- Thread: Rule Proposal for input/vote (/showthread.php?tid=4274) Pages:
1
2
|
Rule Proposal for input/vote - tomviolence - 03-28-2021 PK and I are proposing allowing new owners taking over teams to have one penalty-free drop upon taking over the team, allowing a team to get out of a bad contract, and making orphaned teams a bit more appealing to new owners. Please vote below or add thoughts and input below. RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - Seannyboi77 - 03-28-2021 In favor, would also suggest unlimited free drops. The orphan situation is always bad long term. -ARZ RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - tomviolence - 03-28-2021 We discussed it but figured one would be more fair to existing owners who won't get the chance. RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - Andrewmott - 03-28-2021 I’m good with it RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - SoonerorLitigator - 03-28-2021 Yeah. One is fine, but we are all only a year in and had to manage tight cap in the draft and free agency. Wouldn't be fair to let new teams get that cap space cleared with more than one. RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - YoungColo - 03-28-2021 Cool with me RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - Koneskillers2 - 03-28-2021 I vote yes. Makes orphaned teams more desirable RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - Branum #20 - 03-28-2021 I like it! RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - ProfitKing - 03-29-2021 Yeah I voted for one instead of unlimited due to the fact we were only one year in RE: Rule Proposal for input/vote - Laimbeer40 - 03-29-2021 If you think it will make a difference, then sure. I suspect it's a lack of candidates for new owners rather than the salary. |