Arizona Transactions

https://dynastysportshub.proboards.com We're moving leagues to a new site folks. Several users report not being able to access this site anymore. New board will have 3 admins instead of one absent admin so we should be able to keep things better updated.

28 May 01:20

Jeff

1.3 pick in gig is on the block if anyone is interested

21 May 11:09

Scallywags

gotcha... makes sense. I just have draft brain right now and I'm a degenerate lol.

19 May 19:49

tomviolence

the thought was to wait until after the bulk of memorial day weekend so as to not stall out for a couple days, but I suppose there is no harm in it.

19 May 16:29

Scallywags

gig untimed start now?

18 May 23:28

4sFull

Way to go QFL. Another great draft in the books

18 May 22:10

Thread Modes

Arizona Transactions

Seannyboi77 Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 873
Threads: 338
Joined: May 2020

#10

09-07-2021, 18:46

So, I just made two trades thinking that once the contract is traded I will have received full ownership of that contract. I still would pay a bonus to cut the player (like the rules state and were meant to be), but only because I have full ownership of the contract now.

Because it’s not in the rules anywhere, I feel like I should be able to reverse trades because BOTH PARTIES thought this was the rule. I had mentioned to both trade partners about the cap, and it would basically operate as “free cap” if I choose to release them and pay their bonuses. This was agreed upon by both parties each time thinking that this was an entire piece of the trade itself. This can be confirmed by both parties (IND/HOU).

We should not be punished for bad low bonus rules, especially if it isn’t anywhere in the rules to begin with. The bonus rules should just be addressed and valued up in the next offseason ultimately giving everyone time to catch up to the new rule.

Find