Rules Discussion

[blurred]

Having only been in the league a year, take these with a pinch of salt. I might be missing something.

- I don't really see the benefit in 1 - can't think of (m)any times it would have been used this past season, so looks more like a solution in search of a problem than fixing something wrong with the existing setup.
- Can see the argument for 2 in terms of potentially replacing some admin, but then the first-come, first-served system of bidding on the forum works well enough from my experience. It also keeps a bunch of the transactions in a single place, which can be handy for reference purposes. There are already some happening on Slack, too, and so adding a third space doesn't win me over.
- I'd be against this. It's a 30-team league with 60+ man rosters, including IL. Don't think we need to add any more loopholes to stash people.
- I think I would likely be in favour of 4 and 5, although I don't see the need for a buffer in 5 - just find an appropriate limit and have a clear cut-off.
- Generally not in favour of 6. There's a trade deadline for a reason, and it's close enough to the end of the season for me. Part of the job is to build strength in depth in case of injury, and encourage trades at the deadline to help rebuilders and contenders.
- Largely ambivalent on 7, but would lean no for the reason Ace has put above.