Shoutbox

« archive

avatar
officially saying goodbye
avatar
Thanks brother
avatar
avatar
Reluctantly I will, What is it again?
avatar
OUDAN, you gonna sign up for the new site?
avatar
Last one out, turn off the lights
avatar
GIG pick 1.25 SD traded to Denver for 1.29 and 4.09
avatar
cheers
avatar
You have been activated Scally
avatar
looks nice
avatar
sweet. im in pending approval
avatar
correct. ideally all leagues will be moving over
avatar
Pretty sure GIG and baseball leagues will be following suit shortly.
avatar
So all active leagues here will be at new site?
avatar
https://dynastysportshub.proboards.com We're moving leagues to a new site folks. Several users report not being able to access this site anymore. New board will have 3 admins instead of one absent admin so we should be able to keep things better updated.
avatar
1.3 pick in gig is on the block if anyone is interested
avatar
gotcha... makes sense. I just have draft brain right now and I'm a degenerate lol.
avatar
the thought was to wait until after the bulk of memorial day weekend so as to not stall out for a couple days, but I suppose there is no harm in it.
avatar
gig untimed start now?
avatar
Way to go QFL. Another great draft in the books
Looking for Input on Rule Change
#1
Current Rule: Sign player to 1 yr deal, then they become UFA next year.

Proposed Change: Sign player to 1 yr deal, then they become UFA next year OR you would be given an opportunity to extend the player under the following terms...

1 yr extension at the higher value of 
a) 3x their current salary
b) Their re-sign value in the final rankings that year * 0.85x


Example:

I have Jae'Sean Tate. Current Salary is 1.6, UFA. If I wanted to re-sign him I could do so at
a) 1.6 x 3 = 4.8m
b) Ranked 98th (so we will pretend this is his YE rank)... 7m x 0.85 = 5.95m

Thus I would have the option to extend him to 6.0, UFA.

Example 2:

Pacers have Kenrich Williams at 1.0, UFA
a) 1.0 x 3 = 3.0m
b) Ranked 199th... 2m x 0.85 = 1.7m

So IND could extend him to 3.0m, UFA. 


I don't believe this change would be a huge impact but I did want to give people a little more benefit for finding those diamonds in the rough. Would either guy in this example get re-signed at the new value? Not sure. But it would be nice to have the option. Obviously too late to implement for this year but if we like it, then it could be added for next season.

Thoughts?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Looking for Input on Rule Change - by Laimbeer40 - 03-23-2021, 03:31

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)