Shoutbox

« archive

avatar
officially saying goodbye
avatar
Thanks brother
avatar
avatar
Reluctantly I will, What is it again?
avatar
OUDAN, you gonna sign up for the new site?
avatar
Last one out, turn off the lights
avatar
GIG pick 1.25 SD traded to Denver for 1.29 and 4.09
avatar
cheers
avatar
You have been activated Scally
avatar
looks nice
avatar
sweet. im in pending approval
avatar
correct. ideally all leagues will be moving over
avatar
Pretty sure GIG and baseball leagues will be following suit shortly.
avatar
So all active leagues here will be at new site?
avatar
https://dynastysportshub.proboards.com We're moving leagues to a new site folks. Several users report not being able to access this site anymore. New board will have 3 admins instead of one absent admin so we should be able to keep things better updated.
avatar
1.3 pick in gig is on the block if anyone is interested
avatar
gotcha... makes sense. I just have draft brain right now and I'm a degenerate lol.
avatar
the thought was to wait until after the bulk of memorial day weekend so as to not stall out for a couple days, but I suppose there is no harm in it.
avatar
gig untimed start now?
avatar
Way to go QFL. Another great draft in the books
Offseason rules proposals
#21
Or I guess thinking out loud here we can easy button this and just say that if someone puts in a large bid/raise on a player the cap someone only has to re-raise is 5m?

Ex. Team A leads out with a 20m bid, the subsequent bidder Team B needs only to bid 25m to take the lead? Then Team A has 3 options at this point: 1. declare that they are MATCHING the bid (our proposed rule), 2. MINIMUM RAISE which would be 30m or 3. Exceed the 30m MINIMUM bid and make it whatever your heart desires and lets say Team A makes it 50m, so Team B's only option again is to make their next bid 55m or more
Reply
#22
I think this is getting too complicated now. I agree with Tom's last post. Original bidder only needs to match the existing bid and "will definitely put some language in along the lines of "poker-style up to XXXX amount, at which case bid increments will be XXXX."" to address Juicy's concern. This is pretty easy to remember. Try this for one season and then tweak it if necessary.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)