.png "Dynasty Sports Hub")
+- Dynasty Sports Hub (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com)
+-- Forum: Baseball (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Baseball Leagues (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+---- Forum: National Pastime (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=11)
+----- Forum: National Pastime: History (http://dynastysportshub.epizy.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=118)
+----- Thread: Offseason rules proposals (/showthread.php?tid=11578)
RE: Offseason rules proposals - MasterShonuff - 12-21-2022
Or I guess thinking out loud here we can easy button this and just say that if someone puts in a large bid/raise on a player the cap someone only has to re-raise is 5m?
Ex. Team A leads out with a 20m bid, the subsequent bidder Team B needs only to bid 25m to take the lead? Then Team A has 3 options at this point: 1. declare that they are MATCHING the bid (our proposed rule), 2. MINIMUM RAISE which would be 30m or 3. Exceed the 30m MINIMUM bid and make it whatever your heart desires and lets say Team A makes it 50m, so Team B's only option again is to make their next bid 55m or more
RE: Offseason rules proposals - alanv25 - 12-22-2022
I think this is getting too complicated now. I agree with Tom's last post. Original bidder only needs to match the existing bid and "will definitely put some language in along the lines of "poker-style up to XXXX amount, at which case bid increments will be XXXX."" to address Juicy's concern. This is pretty easy to remember. Try this for one season and then tweak it if necessary.